Emerging markets quarterly digest: Q1 2020 (enkel in het Engels)
Read the publication below or click here to open the PDF.
Emerging markets quarterly digest: Q1 2020
A few green shoots for emerging markets
After the global economic slowdown in 2019, 2020 has started out on
slightly more positive footing. Economic sentiment as well as activity
data support a recovery in the global economy, though not all regions
will evolve equally well.
In emerging markets in particular, there are some notable green shoots popping up on the economic front at the outset of 2020. Better sentiment in manufacturing industries in a number of countries, signs of a gradual recovery in the euro area, still strong growth in the US, and a (temporary) easing of some of the risks related to the external environment are all hopeful signs of stronger growth for emerging markets at the start of the new decade. Indeed, the combination of moderately strong economic growth and easy monetary policy in advanced economies is often a positive one for emerging markets. Some downside risks do remain, of course. Though risks to the external environment, i.e. the US-China trade war and Brexit, have eased, those tensions are far from fully resolved. Furthermore, though the global growth momentum is stronger now than compared to recent months, in annual average terms, we still expect somewhat slower growth in the US, the euro area and China in 2020 compared to 2019. Country-specific factors will also play a role across emerging markets, with some economies experiencing a robust recovery while others face headwinds that span from credit crunches (India) to social unrest (Chile) to ongoing structural and external vulnerabilities (Argentina and South Africa). Overall, however, the outlook for many emerging markets is cautiously positive at the beginning of 2020.
A welcome reprieve for China
A string of positive Chinese data of late suggests that the
government’s previous stimulus efforts are having some effect. China’s
sentiment indiactors in manufacturing (PMIs) have recovered to
expansionary territory while in the services industry they also remain
strong. Industrial production growth is showing nascent signs of
stabilization, as is fixed asset investment in the industrial sector.
Particularly notable is the recovery seen in the automotive industry,
which had been suffering from stricter emission rules and a generally
slowing economy. Vehicle production bounced from a 21.6% yoy
contraction in May 2019 to 8% yoy growth in December 2019. Growth in
total social financing - a measure of credit in the economy - has
recovered from lows reached at the end of 2018 and has stabilised at a
somewhat lower (relative to recent years) but ultimately more
sustainable level (10.7% yoy in November 2019). In the fourth quarter
of 2019, real GDP growth remained stable at 6% yoy, according to
official statistics, bringing China’s full year average growth in 2019
to 6.1%, as anticipated.
Other high-profile positive news for China includes the signing of a
phase I trade deal with the US in January, which avoids a further
escalation of tariffs and reduces some of the tariffs already in
place. China, in exchange, has pledged to increase its imports of US
goods and services by $200 billion over the next two years, which is
more than the total amount China purchased from the US in 2017. It
also made some commitments on intellectual property. The reduced
uncertainty, however, is undoubtedly good news for an economy whose
growth rate slowed from 7.0% in 2017, to 6.7% in 2018, to only 6.1% in
2019 (according to recently revised data). While the trade war was not
the sole driver of the slowdown, it increased uncertainty, weighed on
sentiment, and likely had some negative impact on China’s
manufacturing industry and foreign trade.
Despite this good news, which should support growth in the first
quarter, our overall, long term outlook for China remains unchanged,
with growth steadily edging lower as China’s potential growth rate
declines. Key drivers behind this outlook remain the many structural
challenges facing the Chinese economy, including worsening
demographics and the high indebtedness of both China’s corporate
sector and households. This high indebtedness, in turn, poses risks to
the financial sector and real estate sector, respectively. These
factors complicate China’s transition to a more domestic and
services-based economy. Furthermore, the phase I trade deal does not
settle all of China’s international disputes, including the myriad of
issues related to technology.
While we do expect some further limited policy easing in 2020, such
easing will be measured in the face of elevated inflation driven by
food prices and, more importantly, the aforementioned debt issues. The
PBoC’s announcement that existing loans priced with old benchmark
lending rates should be priced with the new benchmark rates is a
further step towards interest rate reform and is a sign of the
government’s goal of fixing the country’s monetary policy transmission
mechanism. An important watch point will also be the government’s
announcement of its growth targets in March, which will likely be
revised lower to 6% for 2020 (from 6-6.5% previously), and likely even
lower for the next several years. Overall, however, given the above
factors, and ongoing external headwinds and risks, we expect GDP
growth to slow to 5.7% in 2020.
Heterogenous developments in 2019; cautiously positive outlook for
The outlook for several other emerging Asia economies at the start
of 2020 is also cautiously positive. A look at a composite GDP
indicator (see figure 1) shows that much of the growth slowdown in the
region came from China, India, and South Korea. The latter was
particularly affected by a downturn in the semiconductor or high-tech
chip industry. Malaysia, Indonesia and Taiwan, in contrast, have fared
better, generally supported by still strong consumption. Furthermore,
there are signs that chip sales have bottomed out, and a rebound can
be expected in 2020, which will be advantageous to several economies
in the region, especially South Korea. Possibly reflecting this, as
well as a slightly more favorable external environment going forward,
manufacturing sentiment (as measured by PMIs) in Taiwan, South Korea
and Malaysia have all improved in recent months. In addition, low
inflation throughout most of the region and the continued easy policy
of major central banks like the Fed and ECB have given central banks
in the region room to cut policy rates throughout 2019. This policy
easing should help support growth in 2020.
India on shaky ground
As noted above, economic growth in India slowed substantially over 2018 and 2019. The qoq annualized rate of real GDP growth fell from 7.9% in Q1 2018 to only 4.2% in Q3 2019. Much of this slowdown can be attributed to falling private consumption and a credit crunch for private businesses. The latter manifested primarily in 2019 and was driven by a crisis in India’s shadow banking industry. As bank credit to non-bank lenders dried up, small businesses which rely heavily on non-bank institutions for funding saw their credit dry up too.
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has responded with five rounds of
cuts to the policy repo rate. The central bank has lowered rates by
135 basis points since February 2019 to 5.15%. We expect one further
25 basis point cut in the first quarter of 2020 before the RBI pauses
in the face of rising inflation. Though the easing has been slow to
filter through to the economy, PMIs are showing first signs of
stabilization at a level still above 50, signifying expansion. India’s
GDP growth is typically measured over the fiscal year ending in March,
and while annual growth is expected to reach only 5.1% this year (down
from 6.8% the previous fiscal year) a modest recovery is expected
However, this modest recovery is on shaky ground. For the most part,
hard data have yet to confirm the stabilization seen in sentiment.
Furthermore, while some uncertainty regarding Brexit and the US-China
trade war has been lifted, improving the external environment for
India, those risks are not completely resolved. On top of the
complicated economic outlook, India is facing its own political
turmoil. Protests have broken out recently in response to a
controversial citizenship law that is seen as discriminatory against
India’s minority Muslim population. The protests have erupted in
several major cities, including the capital city of New Delhi, and
have turned violent in several cases. If the unrest persists and
damages the recovery in consumer spending, India’s economic slowdown
could be prolonged.
Latin American economies have also faced a difficult two years with
growth slowing notably over 2018 and remaining very sluggish for most
of 2019 (see figure 2). The recession in Argentina starting in 2018
played a substantial role in this, as did a flatlining of the Mexican
economy this year. On the other hand, in both Colombia and Chile
growth kept a strong pace throughout most of 2019.
In Brazil, meanwhile, growth picked up after a particularly weak Q1 2019, buoyed by investment and robust household consumption. Industrial production in Brazil recovered at the beginning of Q4 2019 and the outlook for growth next year is generally positive. Given low inflation, Brazil’s central bank has been able to lower its policy rate several times, altogether bringing the rate from 6.5% in July 2019 to 4.5% as of 11 December 2019. This easing should continue to support growthgoing forward. We expect Brazil’s real GDP growth to therefore reach 1.1% for 2019 – slightly lower than the 1.3% reached in 2018 – and then accelerate to 2.1% growth in 2020.
One major risk factor for some economies in the region, however, is ongoing social unrest and associated political developments. In Chile, retail sales dropped off precipitously in October as protests swept through the country. The demonstrations are a response to rising costs of living and inequality, and they are likely to persist as a referendum on constitutional reform in April approaches. Colombia has also faced a rash of civil unrest in recent months, with several national strikes sparked by proposed pension cuts. The protest movement there has now evolved to reflect widespread and longer-term dissatisfaction with President Duque and the Colombian government.
Beyond domestic political turmoil, there is also the risk that the region could be drawn into foreign political drama as well. In December, US president Trump announced he was re-imposing steel and aluminum tariffs on imports from Brazil and Argentina and then backed down from that threat. The possibility of re-imposing the tariffs remains on the table, however, and the fact that two of the region’s major economies appear to be new targets of Trump’s often destructive trade policies is an important development and risk. However, on a more positive note, the USMCA, the trade agreement between the US, Mexico and Canada that replaces NAFTA, has passed both houses of the US Congress. Hence, there may be both upside and downside risks for the region in 2020, with some economies likely faring better than others.
EMEA (Europe, the Middle East, Africa)
Mixed developments in Central Europe
At first glance it may appear that Central Europe is starting to
feel more intense pressure from the German industrial recession.
Industrial output declined in November by approximately 1% mom
(seasonally adjusted) in Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic.
However, this moderation in industrial production comes as we observe
first signs of bottoming-out in Germany’s industrial sector. Moreover,
the overall impact of the German industrial recession on Central
Europe has been somewhat limited and certainly country specific. While
German manufacturing output has fallen by more than 8% between January
2018 and the end of October 2019 (recovering slightly in November),
the situation in Central Europe is different. Especially in Hungary
and Poland, manufacturing output is well above the levels recorded at
the beginning of the German industrial recession. In contrast, the
Czech Republic has seen a somewhat larger impact, though production
levels have beenbasically flat since the start of the German
industrial recession in spring 2018. Slovakia too seemed to have been
more sensitive to developments in Germany, but industrial production
data in Slovakia tend to be more volatile compared to the rest of the
The resilience of certain Central European industrial sectors can be
partially explained by the lower sensitivity of the region’s
manufacturing sector towards Asian markets (specifically China and
South Korea) compared to Germany. This also helps explain why the
region as a whole has been more immune to the spike in global trade
uncertainty in 2019. In addition, more resilient domestic demand
supported by more relaxed fiscal conditions can explain the higher
resilience of Poland and Hungary compared to the Czech Republic.
Polish and Hungarian governments have been running budgets with
structural deficits around 3% of GDP, while the Czech structural
deficit was expected to be only -0.3% of GDP according to the European
Looking ahead, we remain optimistic with regards to the regional
growth outlook. Although the hard industrial data may deteriorate a
bit further over the next few months, the bottoming-out of German
sentiment and production data, the easing of both the US-China trade
tensions and Brexit uncertainty, and the more encouraging regional
leading indicators are the main arguments for our moderate optimism
for the Central European economies in 2020.
Following a weak start to 2019, Russian economic growth accelerated
in the third quarter, helped by more accommodative monetary policy
(figure 3). The Central Bank of the Russian Federation (CBR) has
delivered rapid monetary easing since mid-2019 (amounting to 150 bps)
on the back of subdued inflation pressures. With headline inflation
remaining below the CBR’s inflation target, we see further, albeit
more limited, room for monetary authorities to continue an easing
cycle and expect the CBR to cut the key rate to 5.5% by
Fiscal policy, on the contrary, has been only gradually turning to a
more expansionary stance, following a post-crisis period of a prudent
macro-economic mix aimed at rebuilding buffers. The implementation of
national investment projects, which total around 3.0% of GDP annually
for the period 2019-2024, has seen a very slow start and accelerated
visibly only towards the end of 2019. We expect that budget spending
will pick-up throughout 2020, supported also by newly announced plans
for family-focused social spending. Although consumer spending is set
to remain relatively sluggish, the supportive mix of fiscal and
monetary policy should boost economic growth modestly in 2020 to
The Turkish economy has rebounded from a recession triggered by a
currency shock in mid-2018. In the third quarter, it posted its first
positive year-on-year growth since Q3 2018, largely thanks to a
combination of expansionary fiscal and monetary policy. While fiscal
stimulus has encompassed tax cuts or food price discounts, monetary
policy delivered an aggressive front-loaded easing. Since the
appointment of the new governor in July, Turkey’s central bank (CBRT)
has consistently surprised with larger-than-expected rate cuts that
cumulatively amount to 1200 bps and brought the key rate to 12.0%.
Furthermore, the CBRT has implemented macro-prudential measures to
revive credit growth, especially from state-owned banks.loaded easing.
Since the appointment of the new governor in July, Turkey’s central
bank (CBRT) has consistently surprised with larger-than-expected rate
cuts that cumulatively amount to 1200 bps and brought the key rate to
12.0%. Furthermore, the CBRT has implemented macro-prudential measures
to revive credit growth, especially from state-owned banks.
The recovery in real GDP growth is set to pick up in 2020 to 2.5% as the Turkish authorities continue to prioritize growth over correcting existing imbalances. This, however, leaves the economy vulnerable and puts the long-term sustainability of primarily credit-driven growth into question. While fiscal policy is likely to remain loose, deteriorating the budget balance further, the central bank is set to cut interest rates further. Elevated inflation that is firmly entrenched in double-digit territory will limit the scope for monetary easing. Hence, we expect a more cautious stance and see the key rate at 10.0% by the end of 2020, with a risk of a more aggressive monetary stimulus amid lingering political pressures.
Another downgrade for South Africa likely
South Africa’s economy continues to be plagued by major structural issues that drag on economic growth and heighten vulnerabilities. Issues include infrastructure bottlenecks, unreliable electricity supply, labor market rigidities and severe inequality. Furthermore, some state-owned enterprises, in particular electricity provider ESKOM, continue to face enormous financial and operational problems requiring state bailouts. As a result of the weaker growth and higher expenditures, South Africa’s fiscal accounts continue to deteriorate. South Africa is now likely to lose the investment grade status of its sovereign debt in 2020 when Moody’s is expected to downgrade its credit rating. For this reason, the treasury’s Medium Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS) to be released in February 2020 will be an important signal for both investors and the ratings agencies. Despite weak growth in 2019 (expected to reach only 0.3% in annual terms) and inflation below the target, the central bank (SARB) remained on hold throughout the year given financing risks. However, as we expected, the SARB finally eased the policy rate in January to 6.25%, on the back of inflation that is well below the target and still sluggish growth. We currently don’t have any more monetary policy easing forecasted for 2020, but given downside risks to growth, additional easing is not off the table. Only a slight rebound to 0.8% growth is expected in 2020.
Middle East & North Africa
The short-term economic outlook for countries in the Middle East and North Africa remains generally subdued given vulnerabilities to slowing global growth, particularly in Europe and China, and still-unresolved uncertainties surrounding global trade and Brexit. Furthermore, geopolitical tensions and domestic political unrest will likely weigh on the region going forward. In particular, the recent escalation of the conflict between the US and Iran raises uncertainty for the region, although we do not expect an escalation to a full-blown military conflict. If the conflict between the US and Iran does escalate further, however, there could be additional economic impacts beyond just Iran. Investment and tourism in neighboring countries like the UAE, for example, could also suffer. There could also be a more sustained impact on the price of oil. Notably, however, oil prices have become much less sensitive to geopolitical developments in the Middle East. This mainly reflects a structural shift in the market as shale oil from the US now represents a significant portion of global oil supply. At the same time, subdued global demand and heightened uncertainties are keeping downward pressure on prices.
Tables & Figures
Outlook emerging market economies